HR MANAGER PENALISED FOR THE EMPLOYER’S BREACHES

In a recent decision by the Federal Magistrates Court, a Human Resources Manager of a company was ordered to pay a penalty for being knowingly involved in breaches of workplace laws by his employer.

In the case of Fair Work Ombudsman v Centennial Financial Services Pty Ltd & Ors a company was found to have breached various sections of the then Workplace Relations Act 1996 (repealed and eventually replaced by the Fair Work Act 2009).  The breaches included setting up sham arrangements and not paying statutory entitlements to employees.

The court proceedings named the sole director of the company as a defendant along with the Human Resources Manager who was not a director of the company.

The HR Manager submitted to the Court that he:“had merely been following the instructions of [the director] and had not had any input into the decisions which gave rise to the contraventions.”  He submitted that his position as the human resources manager was “a mere title” and that he had no authority beyond what was approved by the director

.”However, in considering all the facts, the Court held that the HR Manager had knowledge of the essential facts of the breaches by the company and was knowingly concerned in and participated in the breaches.”

In the second judgment, the Court noted that the events:

“had a chilling effect on his career in human resources and that he has seen a significant decline in his income which would tend to increase the impact on him of any financial penalties imposed in these proceedings.…..The total penalty is $3,750.  I am satisfied that these are just and appropriate amounts as aggregate figures.”

This decision by the Court is a reminder that Managers not just Directors of companies should ensure that the work they undertake complies with the relevant legislative requirements and they do not merely “follow instructions from the Company Directors”.

Fewer employers now qualify for Small Business Fair Dismissal Code

With all the focus on the new Paid Parental Leave scheme that came into effect at the start of the year, many smaller businesses may have failed to note the important change to the definition of “small business” that occurred at the same time.

If you own or manage a “small business”, the new rules could very well affect you.

As of 1 January 2011, only businesses that employ fewer than 15 employees – by simple headcount – qualify as a small business when an employee makes an unfair dismissal claim.

Before the change, a small business was one that employed fewer than 15 full-time equivalent employees.

This is a very important distinction, especially if you employ a number of part-time staff, encourage job sharing and provide flexible working arrangements. Your employees may do the work of fewer than 15 full-time equivalent staff, but in themselves add up to more than 15 people.If this situation applies to your business, you will find that you’re no longer eligible for the special unfair dismissal arrangements that apply to small businesses.

These special arrangements include a minimum employment period of 12 months before employees can make an unfair dismissal claim, and a simple Fair Dismissal Code to help employers ensure dismissals are not unfair.

Paid Parental Leave Scheme starts

The Paid Parental Leave Scheme started on 1 January 2011 and provides 18 weeks of government-funded pay to eligible employees. The rate of pay is equivalent to the national minimum wage. Full-time, part-time, casual, seasonal, contract and self-employed workers may be eligible.

Parents can lodge a claim up to three months in advance. The Family Assistance Office may contact you if one of your employees is eligible.

From 1 July 2011, employers will be required to provide parental leave pay to their eligible employees (funds will be provided to the employer in advance). However, this part of the scheme can start earlier if both the employer and employee agree.

Businesses can register now at www.centrelink.gov.au .